Are New Yorkers really unhappy?

We spend a lot of time wishing each other happiness at this time of year — happy holidays, happy new year, merry Christmas, happy Hanukkah.
So this recent NY Times article about who’s most happy and least happy seems especially well timed.

a study by two economics professors, newly published in Science magazine. The academics — Andrew J. Oswald, of the University of Warwick in Britain, and Stephen Wu, of Hamilton College in Clinton, N.Y. — examined piles of data, tossed them into a research Cuisinart and came up with a guide to American happiness, ranked by state.
On the smiley scale, New York landed on the bottom.

If you're a Science magazine subscriber, click here to read the article by Andrew J. Oswald and Stephen Wu

I found this fascinating as a transplanted New Yorker. When I tell people where we live, they often swoon as they talk about the music, the art, the food, the architecture, public transportation, multicultural population … but they often also say “it’s a great place but I don’t think I could live there.”
Are they on to something? Is New York a better place to visit than to live?
The article goes on:

It falls to a New Yorker to ask how it is, if this is such an unhappy place, that more people are living in the city than ever before: an estimated 8.4 million. “That’s a very sensible point,” Professor Oswald said. Many people, he said, do indeed think of states like New York and California as “marvelous places to live in.”
“The problem,” he said, “is that if too many individuals think that way, they move into those states, and the resulting congestion and house prices make it a nonfulfilling prophecy.”

The study isn’t just looking at New York City — it’s a state by state look so the data include Albany, Poughkeepsie, Syracuse, Schenectady and points all around. But since Connecticut and New Jersey are the next two worst on the happiness scale, maybe proximity to NYC is enough to bring you down?
I would have expected my home state of Michigan, beaten down by the recession and the struggling auto industry, to be more unhappy than New York.
I’m really curious about this. Does the high cost of living, the crowds and the noise make people unhappy? The hurried lifestyle? Is it seeing and envying the super rich who always seem to have it better than you, no matter how well you’re doing?
Or is it reversed? That people who are less prone to happiness move to the New York area — the sensitive artists, musicians and actors, the cynical journalists, the always-striving bankers — and thus bring the score down.
I’ve written before about choosing a home wisely because of the influence it has on your lifestyle. Click here to read that post. How do you think lifestyle and culture influences happiness data?
What role does your hometown and home state play in your happiness? Is it chicken or egg to you?
And happy new year to you, wherever you live.

I'm Colleen Newvine, and I would love to help you navigate your evolution or revolution
Let’s work together

5 Comments

  • Catherine
    Posted December 31, 2009 11:27 am 0Likes

    There are some interesting elements that I wish were more fully addressed in the NYT article and the articles about the study. For example, The Times comments on the economics of a place, but doesn’t link that to education level, which I would suspect has an impact. Also, the states at the bottom of the list have the biggest variations in wealth (eg. Connecticut is one of the richest states but has some of the poorest cities), which could impact results. Another question: there is a note that California is sunny but is on the bottom of the list – does the study delve into such anomolies (not to mention, on the flip side, Maine)?
    It occurs to me that NYC is a place of superlatives such as super rich and super poor. Maybe the Swiss only created the cuckoo clock, but they’re pretty even-keeled, no? This constant swinging between many types of extremes can be tiring for New Yorkers and maybe explains some of the agressiveness we have to manage through every day.
    I don’t think artists, musicians, etc. are necessarily “less prone to happiness” except when you use the adjective “always-striving.” This makes me think of the Buddhist notion that all suffering comes from “grasping and wanting”. Perhaps status quo living makes for a smoother ride? And maybe the inner struggles make us unhappy or happy no matter where we go?
    Happy New Year (from a **happy** New Yorker)!

  • jtebeau
    Posted December 31, 2009 3:58 pm 0Likes

    I think two factors are at play: 1) Are you personally suited to the place you live? and 2) How content are you in general, regardless of location?
    Both are important to me; at times more, at times less.

  • Trackback: The happiest people in the world — Costa Rica? « Newvine Growing — exploring evolution, revolution and living life intentionally
  • Trackback: New York is unlikely to be our forever home « Newvine Growing — exploring evolution, revolution and living life intentionally
  • Trackback: Blogversation 2012: What do you want from your hometown? « Newvine Growing — exploring evolution, revolution and living life intentionally

Leave a reply

Leave a Reply